<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of Flames of War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/archives/2006/03/15/547/future-of-flames-of-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/archives/2006/03/15/547/future-of-flames-of-war/</link>
	<description>War Gaming and Modeling for Pulp, Warhammer, Mordheim and Flames of War</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:47:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/archives/2006/03/15/547/future-of-flames-of-war/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/index.php/archives/2006/03/15/547/#comment-783</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just thinking about the terrain pricing but as for the free rulebooks and planes again fun times!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just thinking about the terrain pricing but as for the free rulebooks and planes again fun times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/archives/2006/03/15/547/future-of-flames-of-war/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/index.php/archives/2006/03/15/547/#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Heh my thoughts exactly Aaron.

Terrain I find less interesting myself as there&#039;s plenty of 15mm scale stuff out in the market already and by the time they release it I will have hopefully finished my North African table anyway. But I&#039;ll reserve judgement until I see the terrain I guess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh my thoughts exactly Aaron.</p>
<p>Terrain I find less interesting myself as there&#8217;s plenty of 15mm scale stuff out in the market already and by the time they release it I will have hopefully finished my North African table anyway. But I&#8217;ll reserve judgement until I see the terrain I guess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/archives/2006/03/15/547/future-of-flames-of-war/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/index.php/archives/2006/03/15/547/#comment-781</guid>
		<description>Its times like this I wonder why I persist with other games/companies.

As you say I think a lot of people will still go out and buy the rules but its great to be able to get a free upgrade.  Very sporting.

I&#039;ve always liked the idea of a &quot;battlefield in a box&quot; but I think the big problem they will face with it is cost.  Its one thing to shell out $300 for an army in a box but it seems more extravagant to do the same with terrain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its times like this I wonder why I persist with other games/companies.</p>
<p>As you say I think a lot of people will still go out and buy the rules but its great to be able to get a free upgrade.  Very sporting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always liked the idea of a &#8220;battlefield in a box&#8221; but I think the big problem they will face with it is cost.  Its one thing to shell out $300 for an army in a box but it seems more extravagant to do the same with terrain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/archives/2006/03/15/547/future-of-flames-of-war/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/index.php/archives/2006/03/15/547/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>It is pretty good news.

I&#039;m especially releived to see that all the current army books will be compiled into a single Mid-war book. Its one of the major critiques of the game and it really does get to be a bit of a PITA at tournaments when you don&#039;t have access to all the rules for an opposing army.

As well the idea of terrain boxes is of interest to me since I can never get enough terrain.

Thanks for the comments about the site. Traffic has been growing through the roof lately and I&#039;ll be moving to a dedicated server and perhaps adding some contributing editors to the site as well.

Interested in writing some news adn reviews? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is pretty good news.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m especially releived to see that all the current army books will be compiled into a single Mid-war book. Its one of the major critiques of the game and it really does get to be a bit of a PITA at tournaments when you don&#8217;t have access to all the rules for an opposing army.</p>
<p>As well the idea of terrain boxes is of interest to me since I can never get enough terrain.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments about the site. Traffic has been growing through the roof lately and I&#8217;ll be moving to a dedicated server and perhaps adding some contributing editors to the site as well.</p>
<p>Interested in writing some news adn reviews? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/archives/2006/03/15/547/future-of-flames-of-war/comment-page-1/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/index.php/archives/2006/03/15/547/#comment-779</guid>
		<description>Heh. It&#039;s pretty big news for Flames of War players! 

I&#039;m pleased by their approach to the 2nd Ed rules, although I can&#039;t see how it can hurt them. If the content in the hardback rulebook is suitably compelling most die-hard FOW players will end up purchasing a copy anyway. I do admire them though because it&#039;s just such an emminently sensible approach that respects you as a player and thus Battlefront actually seem like a company that cares about customer goodwill.

I like your blog...it&#039;s very handy for the news with a clean &#039;just the facts m&#039;am&#039; approach and you cover a wide range of games and products I&#039;ve never heard of/played. Whereas I tend to waffle on about a very small subset of games that I play regularly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. It&#8217;s pretty big news for Flames of War players! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pleased by their approach to the 2nd Ed rules, although I can&#8217;t see how it can hurt them. If the content in the hardback rulebook is suitably compelling most die-hard FOW players will end up purchasing a copy anyway. I do admire them though because it&#8217;s just such an emminently sensible approach that respects you as a player and thus Battlefront actually seem like a company that cares about customer goodwill.</p>
<p>I like your blog&#8230;it&#8217;s very handy for the news with a clean &#8216;just the facts m&#8217;am&#8217; approach and you cover a wide range of games and products I&#8217;ve never heard of/played. Whereas I tend to waffle on about a very small subset of games that I play regularly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/archives/2006/03/15/547/future-of-flames-of-war/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletop-terrain.com/index.php/archives/2006/03/15/547/#comment-778</guid>
		<description>We must have posted this at the exact same time :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must have posted this at the exact same time :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
